Building with Interlocking Blocks | |
Introduction
The interlocking block technique |
Building design
|
The research activities that ultimately led to the development of the interlocking block technique, which is gaining popularity in Thailand, as well as Malaysia and the Philippines, date back to the 1960s. In these countries, houses in the rural areas were traditionally built of timber, which was readily available in the extensive forest areas. However, the alarming rate of deforestation in Thailand - from 70% forest cover in 1936 to about 55% in 1961 (now it is less than 30%) - led the government to initiate research into alternative materials for building construction in the rural areas. Initially, research undertaken by the Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research (TISTR), Bangkok, focused on soil-cement blocks made with the CINVA-Ram manual block press (which was developed in Colombia in 1956). The demonstration houses built with these blocks were cheaper than timber houses, more durable, resistant to water, fire and termites, and aesthetically appealing. The disadvantages, however, were that the blocks were relatively heavy, and building construction required a certain amount of masonry skills. Furthermore, the mortar joints consumed a considerable amount of cement and construction time was relatively long. These disadvantages led to the development of the interlocking block technique by the Human Settlements Division of the Asian Institute of Technology (HSD-AIT), Bangkok, in co-operation with TISTR, in the early 1980s. The first demonstration house using interlocking soil-cement blocks was built in Thailand in 1984. Between 1986 and 1990, the Post Graduate Centre Human Settlements (PGCHS), of the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, assisted these institutions in optimizing the inter- locking block technique, which has now reached a high degree of maturity. Figure 1 Variouse types of interlocking blocks The interlocking block technique The concept of interlocking blocks is based on the following principles:
Figure 2 House built with concrete interlocking blocks A variety of interlocking blocks have been developed during the past years, differing in material composition, shape and size, depending on the required strengths and uses: Different materials
Different shapes and sizes
Production of interlocking blocks Interlocking blocks are produced in special moulds, in which compaction can be done by hand or mechanically, depending on the type of block, material used, required quality and available resources. The blocks can be made directly at the building site, or on a larger scale in a production yard. Soil-cement blocks are commonly manufactured in manually operated blockpresses (modified CINVA Rams). Two workers prepare the soil mix, shovel it into the mould box and close the lid. Compaction is done by a third worker, who pulls down a long steel handle (lever arm), which pushes up the base plate. After opening the lid and ejecting the block, it is removed by a fourth worker and stacked in a shaded place for curing and hardening. Rice husk ash and concrete blocks need tamping, or better still vibration, for proper compaction. Therefore, the manual block press is not suitable. Manual tamping is done by jabbing the mix with a piece of wood or dropping the filled mould several times on a hard surface. Higher compaction and greater strengths are achieved by placing the mould on a vibrating table, or holding a portable vibrator against the sides. After demoulding, the blocks are carried away on pallets for curing. Figure 3 Modified CINVA Ram block press for making interlocking soil-cement blocks Before placing the first course in a mortar bed, the blocks must be laid dry on the foundation around the entire building, in order to ensure that they fit exactly next to each other (leaving no gaps), and that an exact number of full blocks are used, otherwise the system will not function. When laying the first course in the mortar bed, care must be taken that the blocks are perfectly horizontal, and in a straight line, or at right angles at corners. Once the base course is properly hardened, the blocks are stacked dry, with the help of a wooden or rubber hammer to knock the blocks gently into place. Up to 10 layers can be placed at a time, before the grout holes are filled with a liquid mortar - 1 part cement to 3 parts sand (or soil or rice husk ash) to 1 part water. It is advisable to place channel blocks around the building, at window sill height, to install a ring beam. They should also be placed directly above doors and windows to install lintels, and directly below the roof to finish the walls with a ring beam. For increased structural stability, especially in earthquake regions, steel rods or bamboo should be inserted in the vertical grout holes, especially at corners, wall junctions and on either sides of openings. Interlocking blocks are ideally suited for load-bearing wall constructions, even for two or more storeyed buildings, provided that the height of the wall does not exceed 20 times its thickness, and wall sections without butresses or cross walls do not exceed 4.5 m length (to prevent buckling). Though less economic, non-loadbearing constructions are more common. The walls are constructed in the same way as load- bearing walls, but merely serve as infills between the reinforced concrete frame (post and beam) structure, which supports the roof. Care must be taken to achieve a good bond between the walls and frame-work. Figure 4 Dry assembly of interlocking block walls
in Thailand
Figure 5 The German School in Chiangmai, Thailand, under construction with loadbearing interlocking concrete block walls Almost any type of building can be constructed with interlocking blocks, the main design constraints being that the plan should be rectangular and all wall dimensions and openings mustbe multiples of the width of the block type used. All other principles of design and construction, such as dimensioning of foundations, protection against rain and ground moisture, construction of ceilings and roofs, and the like, are the same as for other standard building types. Figure 6 Principles of interlocking block construction
Figure 7 Typical construction site of an interlocking soil-cement block house in Thailand
| |
For further information on building with interlocking
blocks, please contact
Karl Weinhuber (All illustrations, except Figure 4 by K. Weinhuber) |
Published by German Appropriate Technology
Exchange (1995) |
|